Vitamin D: Not Just for Rickets and Osteoporosis

Vitamin D has an important role in regulating cell growth. Laboratory experiments suggest that it helps prevent the unrestrained cell multiplication that characterizes cancer by reducing cell division, restricting tumor blood supply (angiogenesis), increasing the death of cancer cells (apoptosis), and limiting the spread of cancer cells (metastasis). Like many human tissues, the prostate has an abundant supply of vitamin D receptors. And, like some other tissues, it also contains enzymes that convert biologically inactive 25(OH)D into the active form of the vitamin, 1,25(OH)2D. These enzymes are much more active in normal prostate cells than in prostate cancer cells. _Harvard Health

Vitamin D has come a long way since its discovery in 1920. Once seen mainly as a cure and preventative for rickets, and later seen as an adjunct to prevent osteoporosis of ageing, Vitamin D is now considered an important ingredient in the overall quest for lifelong health. Vitamin D may even turn out to be a preventative for heart disease, cancer, viral infections, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and allergic disorders.

Image: Harvard Health

Low levels of vitamin D lead to low bone calcium stores, increasing the risk of fractures. If vitamin D did nothing more than protect bones, it would still be essential. But researchers have begun to accumulate evidence that it may do much more. In fact, many of the body’s tissues contain vitamin D receptors, proteins that bind to vitamin D. In the intestines, the receptors capture vitamin D, enabling efficient calcium absorption. But similar receptors are also present in many other organs, from the prostate to the heart, blood vessels, muscles, and endocrine glands. And work in progress suggests that good things happen when vitamin D binds to these receptors. The main requirement is to have enough vitamin D — but many Americans don’t… even in healthy people, advancing age is linked to an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. _Harvard Health

One of the most intriguing areas of Vitamin D research is in connection to its possible role in preventing cancer:

… Evidence for some cancers, he [Michael Holick] says, is better than others. “If I were to pick one cancer where vitamin D is sure to matter, it would be colon,” he says. “The second would be breast cancer.”

… The vitamin appears to defend against viral infections, too. The annual winter flu season comes at a time when people garner little vitamin D from sunshine and blood levels fall. The timing may not be a coincidence, says Reinhold Vieth, a biochemist at the University of Toronto. Low vitamin D levels might offer the virus the edge it needs to gain a foothold in the population and spread from person to person.

… Another study in the United States showed that substantially more people with low vitamin D develop upper respiratory infections than do people with more of the vitamin, and taking up to 2,000 IU a day reduced such infections by two-thirds in one trial. A Dutch research team also reported online in May in Pediatrics that babies with low levels of vitamin D at birth were several times as prone to develop a severe respiratory viral infection in the first year of life as were newborns with ample amounts.

… Asthma, another immune malfunction that can wreak havoc in the lungs, also shows links to low vitamin D levels. In a study conducted at National Jewish Health respiratory hospital in Denver, researchers found that people with asthma who also had low levels of vitamin D had poorer lung function than asthmatics who had higher levels of the vitamin. _Science News

What about Vitamin D toxicity? That is not a danger for people who take around 1,000 IU or less per day. Many people require more — much more. The only way to know is to have your Vitamin D level measured. And even then, you may be given the wrong advice, because of the way that laboratory norms are calculated in clinical medicine.

The older you are, the more Vitamin D you are likely to need. And the farther from the equator you live, and the fewer days of direct sunshine you are exposed to, the more Vitamin D you will need.

Medical science knows very little about optimum human nutrition. But as we learn more about individual genetic function and more about the mysteries of cell and tissue biology, we will almost certainly learn that everything we now think we know, just ain’t so.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Medicine, Practical Medicine, Survival Prepping. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Vitamin D: Not Just for Rickets and Osteoporosis

  1. Steve Johnson says:

    That article is a perfect example of medical insanity.

    Summary:
    Vitamin D is vital for health
    Almost no food contains vitamin D
    Therefore you should wear sunscreen, stay out of the sun and take vitamin D supplements.

    That’s insane. We evolved to get sunlight. It must hurt them so much when their dogma is absolutely shown to be false.

  2. alfin2101 says:

    The sunlight avoidance insanity was part of the overall ozone hole insanity which has fallen quietly by the wayside for now. Some medical skanks can’t resist the political/media spotlight. And once a myth is established in a bureaucratic stronghold such as modern medicine, it often outlives its usefulness. Remember, the CDC, FDA, and NIH are part and parcel of the Leviathan. And with Obummercare there is no escaping political medicine.

    That’s why everybody needs to know as much as they can about taking care of themselves and the ones they care for. Let the talking head skanks and bureaucrats say anything they want. Chances are, the well informed layman will know more.

    • Steve Johnson says:

      “The sunlight avoidance insanity was part of the overall ozone hole insanity which has fallen quietly by the wayside for now.”

      That puts it all together for me.

      I’d actually forgotten the ozone hole thing – I remember it but hadn’t thought about it in years so never made the connection.

  3. Matt Musson says:

    I guess I am going to have to start drinking milk again. Wait. Does this mean milk is good for us again?

    • Steve Johnson says:

      Milk has next to no vitamin D compared to the amount you need.

      It’s sunlight, indoor tanning or cod liver oil.

  4. neilfutureboy says:

    This is an article did on vitamin D in my home country http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.co.uk/2008/10/vitamin-d-not-vitamin-but-hormone.html

    Scotland is one of the most northerly sizable communities in the world and because we are on the Gulf Stream, particularly cloudy. It does show in our health records. Though if I’m going to be chauvinist about it I could say we Scots must have millennia of evolutionary pressure.

Comments are closed.