Image via Brian Wang at Nextbigfuture
Looking at a world map of Total Fertility Rate by nation:
We see that most of the world’s population growth over the next 40 or 50 years will take place in some of the world’s least productive nations — most dependent upon foreign aid.
The productive populations of developed nations — providers of foreign aide — are shrinking at the same time that populations of recipient nations are growing.
What would happen to the world if the abundant fountain of foreign aide went dry?
Look at medical aide: The primitive nations do not make most of their own vaccines, antibiotics, surgical instruments and supplies, nor do they supply most of their best physicians, surgeons, or public health workers.
Look at transportation and power: Primitive nations do not build most of their transportation and power infrastructures, and are dependent on outside assistance for maintenance and upgrades.
Look at food: SubSaharan Africa is a fertile land, capable of supplying all its food needs, with an abundant excess for export. But when you see photographs appealing for hunger aide, the photos are almost invariably of black Africans. Look what happened when Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, and a wealthy food-exporting nation became an impoverished nation of undernourished people.
And on and on…. Africa cannot support the population it has already without abundant aide and assistance from the outside. How long can the developed world fund and support a population explosion of people who are among the least intelligent, least productive, and most violent people in the world?
Robert D. Kaplan’s prescient 1994 article, The Coming Anarchy, and the subsequent book, were premised on the assumption that foreign aide would continue. To understand the bleak picture without foreign aide, imagine the anarchic devastation as portrayed by Kaplan, but multiplied by 100 and spread over 10 times the geographical area.
As the blooming populations of underdeveloped nations spill out into more developed nations, what should we expect? Will people transplanted from underdeveloped nations suddenly become the equivalent of people who have always lived in more developed areas — in terms of productivity, self-reliance, conscientiousness, orderliness, and so on?
No matter where a person goes, there he is. A small proportion of persons transplanted from the high TFR undeveloped world to the low TFR developed world, will succeed in becoming self-sufficient, positive additions to their new country. These are persons with relatively high IQ and EF (executive function), compared to their fellow immigrant countrymen. Most of the rest, unfortunately, are apt to end up on welfare rolls or in the criminal justice system, or both.
We can safely make such predictions, based upon the behaviours of third world people already living in the advanced world, and on the biology-based behaviours of third world people currently living in the third world.
In the past when SubSaharan blacks transplanted to more developed countries, their progeny has accounted for a much higher level of crime than the progeny of other population groups.
Once we accept the reality of these stark racial facts, we must naturally wonder about the causes, and also why the historical trends seem to have been moving in exactly the wrong direction over most of the last quarter-century. _ http://www.unz.com/article/race-and-crime-in-america/
Statistically, it would seem that the higher the population prevalence of blacks, the more crime. This is as true in Europe as it is in the Americas.
One of the ironies of the brave new multicultural world, is that the victim population groups must pay ransom to the violent population groups to keep levels of violence to levels that can be largely ignored by government, media, and academia.
One thing that didn`t help the cause of the people who burned and looted was that two days into the rioting, TV newscasts carried pictures of long lines of people at a Los Angeles post office, waiting for their welfare checks. You couldn`t ask for a more graphic illustration of what bothers the middle-class taxpayers. The city is burning, demands are being made, and meanwhile each person in line at the post office represents tax money that is going out of a working person`s pocket. Several of the people in line told interviewers that they were inconvenienced by the failure of federal workers- mail carriers-to hand-deliver their checks. _Chicago Tribune
When seen in this way, both foreign aide and domestic welfare to transplanted third world populations can be seen as a type of extortion payoff. “Keep paying us and we will not beat and kill all of you at one time.” Or something like that.
To monitor how effectively these payoffs against violence are preventing third world in the first world violence, check these websites often:
Nonwhite Violence Against Whites
Color of Crime compilation of official US government statistics on inter-racial crime
Within the nations of the developed world, the higher the proportion of third world people possessing generally low IQ, low conscientiousness, poor executive functions, high violent tendencies, and low impulse control grows — the lower the quality of life will become for those who must pay the bills and try to go on about their lives as best they can.
If you think you know what a holocaust is, wait until you see the brave new world when it runs out of other people’s money.
HFTB-PFTW; Be aware wherever you go, of both dangers and opportunities.
Some parts of the world will pass through The Coming Anarchy relatively unscathed. Those would be places that successfully restrict the numbers of low IQ/ poor EF/ high TFR third world immigrants, as well as those places where people and their progeny are wise, resilient, competent, and dangerous.
It is never too late for a dangerous childhood.
Other problems with foreign aide — massive corruption in recipient states.
Money-grubbing for international aide at the climate talks — situations where China and India want to be treated like “developing nations.”
I have read that Kenya’s population would likely drop by 50% if foreign aid was suddenly cut off. They are unable to even grow enough of their own food and certainly couldn’t afford to import it (without aid).
The point above was brought up by a foreign aid worker from the UK as part of a larger rant about the uselessness of aid for Africa. He was a lefty that became disillusioned after being repeatedly hammered in the face by reality.
I can’t remember the man’s name, but he was basically threatened with thought crimes for speaking out. This happened some years back. It made a minor stir in the online press / blog sphear.
HILN: What you say is likely true. Not only would the current population drop, but after the population stabilised at a lower level you would see a shift in the “population pyramid” with fewer live births and fewer children surviving to child-bearing years.
In Africa we are seeing the foreign-aide financed building of the most massive slums-with-open-sewers in the world. Lagos at 40 million, Kinshasa at 30 million. Suddenly Newark .doesn’t seem so bad. 😉
In such places the demand for outside assistance is infinite, and futile — without some hard-headed policy changes.
Pingback: Brave New World: Running Out of Other People’s Money | Conservative Free Thinkers
Look at the size of Africa. It’s huge. I had no ideal it was quite so big until I saw this picture.
They’ve got plenty of room to do just about anything they want if they were capable. Next time someone says the US needs more immigrants point out that Africa would be a better place to immigrate to as they have so much land.