Just over 23 years ago, the 1992 Los Angeles riots reminded Americans that the violent unrest of the black underclass had only been sleeping since 1968, when riots erupted in 125 US cities. Massive levels of financial assistance, special preferences, and affirmative action from cradle to grave had done nothing substantial to quell the black sense of victimhood and a vengeful sense of entitlement. In Los Angeles, a low level rage war of blacks against whites had come out from under cover, once again, for a time. But in hundreds of cities, it continues on a slow simmer, waiting for a spark to set it off in earnest.
It could happen again in any of hundreds of cities. St. Louis and Baltimore come to mind, but it is known that in the US, the most violent cities are black majority cities. … More Some cities are just waiting for an excuse to self-destruct.
A reminder of how it happened in Los Angeles, 1992:
The city was burning around us. They were going to try to keep us safe. We were in Koreatown, and it was April 29, 1992…A teacher said he would allow me to follow him around the city. Then I could make my way back to Pasadena. The deal he insisted on was: If something happened to me, if my car was stopped, he was not going to help me…Nancy instructed me to stay close. We drove south on Broadway. I had never seen anything like it. Fires, looting, anarchy. We were trying to shoot photos from the car. Paul insisted we stay inside. I was trying to get my flash to fire. It worked the day before and the day after — but not that night.
I didn’t see the man with the gun that came up to Nancy’s window. I was focused on my malfunctioning flash. She told Paul: “Drive, drive, drive.”
We barreled through the chaos. I started counting the gunshots. That’s one shot. That’s two. That’s three. _LATimes
In 1992 Los Angeles, long suppressed resentment and rage flared into flame. Angry glares become violent outbursts. Mobs of men and boys stalked anyone who looked out of place, with murderous intent.
A city that had been smoldering for decades burst into flames once again. Like Watts, like Detroit, like Newark, like any town or inner city that had collected and cherished a critical mass of resentment and hatred, LA flared orange and red.
A people who had been conditioned to blame everything from poverty to disease to migraines on “the oppressor race” were prepared to unleash their long suppressed anger and hate.
People were dragged out of cars and trucks, beaten and murdered in an orgy of violent emotion. No one could explain, calmly and rationally, why they did these things. They only knew it felt good. Community leaders and elected representatives supported and excused their actions.
The violence was not new — it had been present in every inner city neighborhood around the country. It was the intensity and focus of the violence which proved a revelation. Thoughtful analysts began to look at roots of violence around the world, considering a possible racial or genetic basis.
Cognitive science had learned that intelligence was highly heritable, with clear statistical stratification by racial categories. Perhaps tendencies to violence were similarly heritable? While not a politically correct question, it was a crucially important question for rational people to ask.
Global maps of average IQ, birth rates, GDP, literacy, homicide, and other measures of social function and dysfunction all seemed to stratify according to regional — and often racial — characteristics. Certainly culture, religion, rule of law, corruption, and more all contributed to the overall portrait, the contribution of racial and genetic components could not be denied out of hand — and required more study.
Thoughtful persons began to ask whether entire population groups were being left behind by advances in science and technology. As the infrastructures of advanced societies came to rely more and more on sophisticated technologies — which required higher cognitive aptitude to maintain — it became clear that populations with low average IQs would struggle to keep up.
Chronic frustration at lack of achievement was naturally converted into blame toward those who did succeed. As “underclass” status became inter-generational, political leaders and media conglomerates found an advantage in stoking envies and resentments, despite the obvious risk of violence exploding out of control.
And so the dark, rank, violent underbelly of engineered diversity is exposed, time and again. But few learn the lesson — that prosperous and successful societies must operate on trust. Without trust, the machine accumulates a destructive grit and grime that leads to societal breakdown. As long as innate inequality and cultural incompatibilities are denied, the societal trajectory is downward.
[The above portion of this article is adapted from a 2012 posting on Al Fin: http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2012/04/20-years-of-progress.html ]
On average, scientific studies and close observation find black populations to be statistically less intelligent, more violent (see genetic causes), less able to plan ahead or to constrain criminal impulses, and most likely to be made utterly superfluous in the coming technological revolutions. And that’s not all.
Respected economist and political philosopher Thomas Sowell — who happens to be black — says that the US is currently living through a “censored race war.” The low level race war is being censored by media, government, academia, and popular culture, because it does not fit the narrative of the consensual delusion.
But within this long black-on-white race war, particular incidents stand out, illustrating the level of hatred and viciousness that lies beneath the surface waiting for the slightest excuse to erupt into flames, death, and destruction.
The Tulsa Outrages January 2013:
The confessed perpetrators:
More from the black on white race war in Tulsa … The black race war has thrived because it enjoyed the support of organizations such as the white-founded NAACP, the antiversites, the MSM, and the courts, and because white Communists realized that they could use blacks to topple free Western governments. __Race War is Real
More: Al Fin on race murder as initiation rite in US black culture.
Black neighborhoods — with 75% or greater illegitimacy rates — have long since become “schools of crime” and proving grounds of violence. As most other populations age, endless new cohorts of violent and wilding black youth look forward to softer populations of future victims.
But there is a large fly in the ointment for black community planners of an expanded black-on-white race war. A massive influx of Latino immigrants is pushing into formerly black neighborhoods, shoving blacks and black gangs aside by the sheer bulk of incoming Hispanics.
… the reason you don’t hear much about black-versus-Hispanic violence in America is that you’re not supposed to hear much about it. It’s the sort of thing that swims upstream against the dominant narrative with the tenacity of a thuggish, heavily tattooed salmon.
… Mexicans tend to prey on blacks in West Coast cities where they’ve already become an undisputed majority, while it’s blacks preying on Mexican intruders in East Coast cities where blacks still hold a numerical advantage…
… If demographic trends continue, Mexicans will have the clear numerical advantage in this simmering war. They already seem to have an organizational edge—the Mexican Mafia has allegedly issued orders from prison for Hispanic gang members to quit squabbling among themselves and work together to drive out all mayates from the barrios. The masterminds behind black organized crime don’t seem to be nearly as organized.
This silent war is happening on a scale that would ensure wall-to-wall media coverage if white people were involved in any way. But since it doesn’t fit the script, it winds up on the cutting-room floor.
Black perpetrators commit the most violent crimes in the US. In NYC in a recent year, 70% of criminal shooters were black, over 25% were hispanic, and roughly 2% were Asian and almost 3% were “white.” Source
The writing is on the wall for North American inner city blacks: Hispanics are coming, and the time for unopposed black youth and black gang terror against entire cities such as Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis, Oakland, and Philadelphia may be coming to a close. But will hispanics be less violent than the blacks they replace?
In Ron Unz’ “Race and Crime in America,” he suggests that hispanic crime rates may be as low as — or lower than — “white” crime rates. A number of problems with methodology suggest that Unz’ “correlation coefficients” underestimate hispanic crime rates by as much as 50% or more. But such statistics were never meant to be definitive comparators of crimes perpetrated by race. They only give rough estimates, and suggest ways forward using more rigorous statistical methods. It seems clear that overall, hispanic crime rates are significantly lower than those of blacks, but still higher than those of asians or “whites.”
So, in view of this ongoing demographic replacement, how would you deal with “the Black Problem?” Hint: Affirmative action and a long list of other costly programs and policies of appeasement have been of questionable value to society as a whole.
“Color of Crime” pdf uploads available, based upon official US government statistics
People of the UK and Europe are likely to have a tougher time of it, dealing with the endless flow of low-IQ, high violence immigrants from Africa and the Middle East. Between the violent fanaticism and sexual predation of Muslim immigrants, and the more mindless violence and predation of African newcomers, Europe is in for a long, deadly struggle.