The Tragic Consequences of Forced Egalitarianism

Group Differences in Aptitude Gottfredson, L. S. (2006). Social consequences of group differences in cognitive ability (Consequencias sociais das diferencas de grupo em habilidade cognitiva). In C. E. Flores-Mendoza & R. Colom (Eds.), Introducau a psicologia das diferencas individuais (pp. 433-456). Porto Allegre, Brazil: ArtMed Publishers.

Group Differences in Aptitude
Gottfredson, L. S. (2006). Social consequences of group differences in cognitive ability (Consequencias sociais das diferencas de grupo em habilidade cognitiva). In C. E. Flores-Mendoza & R. Colom (Eds.), Introducau a psicologia das diferencas individuais (pp. 433-456). Porto Allegre, Brazil: ArtMed Publishers.

Different Breeding Populations Evolved Differently

When life or death depends on your ability to follow a certain way of life, you are necessarily being selected for certain heritable characteristics. Some of these are dietary—an ability to digest milk or certain foods. Others, however, are mental and behavioral, things like aptitudes, personality type, and behavioral predispositions. This is because a way of life involves thinking and behaving in specific ways. Keep in mind, too, that most mental and behavioral traits have moderate to high heritability.

… This gene-culture co-evolution began when humans had already spread over the whole world, from the equator to the arctic. So it followed trajectories that differed from one geographic population to another. Even when these populations had to adapt to similar ways of life, they may have done so differently, thus opening up (or closing off) different possibilities for further gene-culture co-evolution. Therefore, on theoretical grounds alone, human populations should differ in the genetic adaptations they have acquired. The differences should generally be small and statistical, being noticeable only when one compares large numbers of individuals. Nonetheless, even small differences, when added up over many individuals and many generations, can greatly influence the way a society grows and develops. __ Peter Frost Anthropology blog

Ranking different populations for their achievements, it is clear that sub Saharan Africans and Australian aborigenes shake out near the very bottom of the pile. Not so coincidentally, when measured for IQ, those populations likewise end at or near the bottom of all tested populations.

IQ Indigenous Peoples

IQ Indigenous Peoples

Low IQ breeding populations never invented the wheel, did not develop written language or histories, had no science or maths, left no significant technological artifacts, have no record of sophisticated art or music, and left descendants who have largely fallen into the government welfare and dependency trap with no likely avenue of escape.

Tracing the migrations and diasporae of these differently-endowed indigenous people, one can update the global IQ map to a coarse approximation for modern times.

Global IQ by National Average IQ Scores

Global IQ by National Average IQ Scores

When high IQ nations contain significant numbers of low-IQ immigrants, these immigrants tend to settle in specific parts of cities to form ghettoes, barrios, banlieus, and other dysfunctional neighborhoods that frequently turn into “no-go zones” for normal trade and discourse. These areas are often hot-beds of crime, violence, and insurrection. More fine-grained maps of population IQ, population crime, government dependency, corruption, poverty, and general dysfunction, would cause these regions to light up in fluorescent neon.

Modern Western Governments Subsidise Failure and Punish Success

Countries tend to get more of what they reward, and less of what they tax and punish. This helps to explain the perplexing growth of destructive underclasses in Europe and the Anglosphere — regions that otherwise would represent a great hope for the world’s future due to native traits of invention, innovation, and general orderliness and positive goal orientation.

Unfortunately — and thanks to prominent government policies — the bright populations of Europe and the Anglosphere are being replaced by what are largely duller and more violent populations from the third world.

In one generation, Europe will be unrecognizable.

Eastern Europe now has “the largest population loss in modern history”, while Germany overtook Japan by having the world’s lowest birth rate.

Europe, as it is aging, no longer renews its generations, and instead welcomes massive numbers of migrants from the Middle East, Africa and Asia, who are going to replace the native Europeans, and who are bringing cultures with radically different values about sex, science, political power, culture, economy and the relation between God and man.


Human Populations are Not Interchangeable

As a result of the ongoing replacement of high aptitude, high achievement populations of Europe and the Anglosphere, by low aptitude, low achievement, high violence populations of the third world, the average global IQ is on a downward track.

Change in Global IQ from 1950 to 2050

By replacing high-IQ, inventive, orderly European populations with low-IQ, parasitic, violent third world populations, the governments of Europe and the Anglosphere are placing their citizens of European origin in an untenable position: Either they must submit to their slaughter and replacement, or they must go against their own innate nature and rebel against their governments — and fight against their replacement.

One might claim that it is only necessary for people of European origin to procreate more, in order to survive. But such a claim reveals a deep ignorance of underlying government incentives, which punish success and reward failure. Government taxation, regulation, and benefits are skewed against people of European origin and to the benefit of people of third world origin. As a result, birthing wards and early schools of Europe and the Anglosphere are filling with third world young while the young of more intelligent, inventive, and orderly people are disappearing at an ever more rapid rate.

What are the Solutions to this Government-Instigated and Accelerated Problem?

It is important to understand that what we are describing here is only the tip of the iceberg. Most instinctive reactions to this genocide-by-government-policy tend to be counterproductive and misdirected. Knee-jerk emotional reactions will only speed the genocide and increase the difficulty for your families and friends. Conspiracy theories — in general — just make you think and act stupidly.

If you are thinking along the lines of developing “islands of competence” complete with parallel infrastructure, trade, and information / people exchange, you are much closer to the mark. First it helps to understand how deeply the problem extends. — Extensive links to articles on human biodiversity — Scientific monograph on human biodiversity

Genetics of violence links

Reading information sources such as those above will help many people to understand why effective preparations are necessary — why provisions need to be made.

Once the need for effective action is established, working groups of people who combine visionary traits with practical competencies will need to build bases of operation, action plans for expansion, and careful networking protocols for cooperation with other similar groups.

The Dark Enlightenment and Neo-Reactionary thought provide philosophical reasons for breaking away from mainstream thinking, above and beyond the de facto genocide being carried out by the governments of the west against their most productive and inventive peoples.

Philosophy and reason for action are only bare beginnings, of course. Competency and willingness to act in building the necessary shadow infrastructures must follow-on quickly, once awareness of the problem begins to dawn.

More on the “Islands of Competence Model”:

The easiest introduction to “islands of competence” for most persons of modern extraction is the concept of the “city-state.” The parallel is not a perfect one, but it is a useful mental icebreaker for those who do not quite know where to start.

Various conceptual understandings of “city-state:”

A city-state is a sovereign state that consists of a city and its dependent territories.[1][2] Historically, this included famous cities like Rome, Athens, Carthage,[2] and the Italian city-states during the Renaissance—but today only a handful of sovereign city-states exist, with some disagreement as to which are city-states. However, a great deal of consensus exists that the term properly applies to Singapore, Monaco, and Vatican City. In particular, Singapore has been referred to by The Economist as the “world’s only fully-functioning city-state”.[3] __

Besides Singapore, Monaco, and the Vatican, several other modern thriving entities could also qualify in some ways as “city-states.”

city-state, in ancient Greece, Italy, and Medieval Europe, an independent political unit consisting of a city and surrounding countryside. The first city-states were in Sumer, but they reached their peak in Greece. From the beginning of Greek history to its climax in the 5th and 4th cent. B.C., the Greeks were organized into city-states, of which there were several hundred. The first Italian city-states were Greek colonies. Later Etruscan and native city-states emerged, including Rome. After the fall of the Roman Empire, many Italian cities (e.g., Florence, Genoa, Venice) were city-states until the 19th cent., as were such N German cities as Bremen and Hamburg. The Greek word polis meant both city and city-state. Since the city-state was independent, different states—and the same state at different times—had a variety of governments, ranging from absolute monarchy to pure democracy. __

A full reading of the “infoplease” entry above displays the authors’ innate distaste for the city-state concept. Recognising and understanding the particular bias of an information source is one of the earliest lessons taught in the Dangerous Child method.

CITY-STATE. City-states were autonomous, self-governing states led by a city. They controlled land outside the walls, from a few square miles, for many of the imperial free cities of Germany, to the huge land-and-sea empire of the Republic of Venice. All city-states had collective governments, usually a narrow or broad oligarchy. With the exception of the largely rural Swiss city-states, their economies were based on trade and manufacturing. A vital part of European politics, economy, and culture in 1500, city-states declined in importance in the next three centuries.

City-states rose in the Middle Ages in areas of Europe lacking strong territorial monarchies. North Italian towns won their independence from the Holy Roman Empire in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Geographical remoteness and mountains protected the Swiss city-states from outside rule. In Germany many towns had achieved the status of imperial free city by the end of the Middle Ages. They governed themselves but were expected to follow the lead of the Holy Roman Empire in foreign policy and to provide financial support when necessary. __

None of the excerpts above fully captures the concept of “islands of competence” used in the Al Fin nomenclature. But historical analogs can be very useful when one is first forming a new concept.

Another approach to new concept clarification is to look at a concept’s opposite. In this case, we would provide examples of “islands of incompetence.” Such dysfunctional centres of activity are easy to find in the modern world, wherever political entitites are administered by the corrupt, the dysgenic, the insane, the criminal, or peoples of low competence levels. Nations of sub Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, the Muslim world, and across much of Latin America provide numerous examples of islands of incompetence. Cities administered by leftists, criminal gangs, dysgenic peoples of nepotistic tendency, etc. likewise provide clear examples of “islands of incompetence.”

Most moderns have been so indoctrinated by nation-state concepts that they are unable to conceive of a workable model of networked, interacting, freely trading “islands of competence.” This is to be expected in today’s world of cradle to grave skankstream indoctrination. Such persons of limited imagination will necessarily be left behind, for the most part, when the vigorous shaking of the world begins.

Note: A few foundational concepts for “islands of competence” are introduced in The Dangerous Child blog, the other currently active Al Fin blog.

This entry was posted in Cognition, Demographics, Dysgenics, Idiocracy, IQ and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Tragic Consequences of Forced Egalitarianism

  1. Abelard Lindsey says:

    Many people on alt-right blogs are actually hostile to the “islands of competence” ideas such as city-states. I’m not sure why this is. But it does suggest that even some of the alt-right people suffer from the same psychological pathologies that afflict many others.

  2. Abelard Lindsey says:

    One explanation is that the alt-right itself may not be devoted exclusively to creating a society based on “Heinleinian” competence, but rather devoted to other objectives that conflicts with the “islands of competence” model.

    • alfin2101 says:

      Or perhaps the alt-right is actually a dog’s breakfast of fools, knaves, and competent wise men in unpredictable proportions subject to change.

      Most political ideologues would not know what you meant by “Heinleinian competence.” The possibility that large numbers of the public might develop a Heinleinian competence would give most political operatives, journalists, candidates, and government officials a heart attack.

    • AAB says:

      “Heinleinein people”/self-sufficient people are as much an anathema to globalists as Autarkic countries are. Globalists love specialisation, whether it’s in people or countries. Just think of Tony Blair and his so-called “information revolution”, when the UK was supposed to ditch all of it’s manufacturing industry and just become a nation of data processors. It’s madness. What are the low IQ people supposed to do? What happens if the production/supply chain gets broken? What happens if one country has a failed harvest, or doesn’t produce enough food, to feed the other countries in the Global Federation? It all goes hideously wrong. Every nation should be self-sufficient in its basic requirements in food, clothing, energy etc. After that they can trade all they want.

Comments are closed.