Fossil Fuels Beat Greens Into Submission

Continue to Supply Over 80% of World’s Energy Needs

Every year since 1971, more than 80% of all our energy has come from fossil fuels. That’s still true today, which is surprising for two reasons. Most nuclear power plants came online between 1971 and 1990, and most renewable energy farms were built in the last 10 years. We’ve added so many more non-fossil-fuel energy sources in the past 45 years, and yet it doesn’t seem to be at all reflected in the chart. __ https://qz.com/1144207/the-worlds-astonishing-dependence-on-fossil-fuels-hasnt-changed-in-40-years/

Hydrocarbons Still Power the World
Image Source

… [OPEC] says fossil fuels will remain the main energy source decades from now. The organization’s annual World Oil Outlook published Tuesday says renewables are projected to record the fastest growth but their share of total energy supply is still anticipated to remain below 5.5 percent by 2040. __ quoted in Energy Matters

The world cannot survive without its fossil fuels, despite 50 + years of the constant “renewables are taking over” drumbeat. The belated realisation by Deutschland’s Green party that it has been drumming out of time, is giving lefty-greens around the world a big headache.

After the latest round of exploratory talks between the parties, the Greens said they were ready to admit that their goal of a ban on combustion engines by 2030 was unrealistic. “It is clear to me that we will not be able to enforce a ban on internal combustion engines by 2030,” the Greens’ co-leader Cem Özdemir told Stuttgarter Zeitung. The Greens are also prepared to modify their demand that the 20 most polluting coal-fired power plants in Germany should be shut by 2020. __ Euan Mearns

The Prussians already face a looming exodus of heavy industry due to high costs and poor reliability of power. Germany would freeze and go into a recession without its coal plants and its grid connections with other nations who utilise massive nuclear and hydroelectric resources. Germany’s green hypocrisy has resulted in consumer power costs that rank near the highest levels in an already power-costly Europe.

It is clear what Germany needs to do — move back to nuclear power for both heat and electricity needs. Without fully facing this reality, Germany will continue to lose out to its industrial competitors in China and North America.

China, for example, has no qualms about expanding its own nuclear power fleet. The dragon is rapidly building up dozens of nuclear reactors for electric power, and is now considering building nuclear plants that would produce heat exclusively.

nineteen reactors totaling 19.9 GW are under construction in China, accounting for more than a third of all nuclear projects under construction worldwide. The country plans a total of 58 GW of new nuclear by 2024, with China expected to surpass the United States as the country with the most nuclear electricity generating capacity by 2032. __ http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2017/11/eia-forecasts-nuclear-growth-in-china-decline-in-the-united-states.html quoted by Euan Mearns

Japan is working hard to re-start its nuclear power plants, and France is moving to turn back its earlier plans to retire its own nuclear reactor contingent.

Enough Hydrocarbons to Run the World for Centuries Longer

Abundant Gas Hydrates
Der Spiegel

As we have pointed out many times — both here and at the late Al Fin Energy blog — this planet holds enough oil, gas, coal, bitumens, kerogens, gas hydrates, and other hydrocarbons to power the planet for centuries yet. But there is no need to tap into all of that combustible fossil fuel energy, when the wise development of advanced nuclear fission and nuclear fusion could power humans both on-planet and off-planet for many millenia.

Impoverished political ideologies — particularly on the left — have retarded the development of progressive, affordable, efficient, and reliable forms of energy and power for several decades now. As a result, humans are still forced to use primitive hydrocarbons for the bulk of their energy needs — and will continue to do so for decades more, until the slow-witted political human brain realises that nuclear power is the only way to power large human populations into the future.

Energy Density Comparison from Wikipedia
Fusion, Fission Orders of Magnitude Better than Chemical and Other Energy Sources

Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst. It is never too late to have a Dangerous Childhood © .

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Electrical Power Grid, Energy, Germany, Green Quagmire, Nuclear Power and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Fossil Fuels Beat Greens Into Submission

  1. Pepin the Short says:

    Though Japan and China may be interested in expanding their nuclear power capabilites, here in the US nuclearand coal plants have been closing down – and for reasons not directly related to environmental extemism. Ultra-efficient next generation natural gas plants have put the crunch on both coal and nuclear plants. This quote captures much of the essence:

    ” A conventional coal plant spends $95.10 to produce a megawatt-hour of power — which can power 1,000 homes. A conventional natural gas plant with combined cycle turbines can do it for $75.20, according to a government analysis. A nuclear plant spends $95.20, a hydroelectric plant $83.50. When extensive environmental controls are added the gap is wider. A coal plant with carbon capture and storage features spends $144.40 to make a megawatt-hour, a gas-fired plant with such carbon capture features $100.20.”

    http://www.govtech.com/fs/Gas-Fueled-Plants-are-Changing-the-Electricity-Grid-Landscape.html

    The big reason for this low cost of gas compared to coal or nuclear is due to technolgical advances which have greatly improved the efficiency of these newest gas-fired plants. See this article from Forbes as just one of many example articles:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2016/04/10/u-s-natural-gas-electricity-efficiency-continues-to-improve/#2660f7af35a4

  2. infowarrior1 says:

    I think for the modern world to be habitable not only energy and basic needs would be required. But the importance of beauty in all that is built and made which feeds the human soul and contributes to his psychological health.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s