Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson, and Brett Weinstein… Where They Belong

I Am Not Talking About Vancouver

Tomorrow, 23 June 2018, Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris will attempt another futile debate on the relative merits of their divergent epistemologies. The event at the Orpheum Theatre in Vancouver is sold out.

The next day, 24 June 2018 — again at the Orpheum — Harris and Peterson will have a moderated debate, with Brett Weinstein presiding as intercessor.

The fact that both events have been sold out for some time highlights the public interest in both Harris and Peterson — as well as for Weinstein, in the second event.

They Are Where They Should Be On the Larger Stage

Beyond Vancouver and all the other cities where these men are individually sharing their ideas with an interested public, their presence is being felt around the world on podcasts, YouTube videos, books, media interviews, and even testimony before the US Congress.

Where Were They Two Years Ago?

Two years ago, Weinstein was teaching biology at Evergreen State, Peterson was teaching psychology — doing research — seeing clients at U. of Toronto, and Sam Harris was writing books, practising meditation and Brasilian jiu jitsu, and attempting to refine his podcasts to reach a wider public.

But over the past two years the public has been taking greater note of these three — along with others who have been christened members of a group known as “The Intellectual Dark Web (IDW).”

People such as Camille Paglia, Christina Hoff Sommers, Jonathan Haidt, Eric Weinstein, etc. have been around for a long time — but are suddenly receiving more popular attention for their outspoken viewpoints, which often clash with the dominant politically correct postmodern neo-Marxist vision that guides most of the media, academia, foundations, activist groups, and many of the deep government states of the world.

Individuals who were first drawn to these independent points of view by Jordan Peterson or Sam Harris, are beginning to branch out and read the works of Sommers, Haidt, Paglia, and more.

It is not important that these persons are not perfect avatars of truth or deep intellect. Each is human and has significant flaws of both a personal and intellectual nature. If you are looking for a messiah perhaps you should convert to messianic Judaism.

In a world drowning in the stifling suppression of free thought and speech — especially in academia, media, and many governmental jurisdictions — the willingness of individuals such as those in the “IDW” to take public stands in person and on new & old media, holds the door to daylight and fresh air open — if just a crack.

Donald Trump is Something Else That Changed

Two years ago, Donald Trump was campaigning through a fierce primary schedule in the quest for the Republican nomination for US President. His chances were slim and no one knew what they might expect from a “President Trump,” however unlikely the prospects for such a thing might have been.

Two years later and Trump continues to be full of surprises, keeping his critics in frantic confusion, off balance. By keeping the news and entertainment media fixated on his tweets and other public statements, Trump has opened considerable room in the back spaces of the public sphere for new voices — including the voices of people who thoroughly hate the US President.

But it is not so very important, exactly, what all of these people are saying word for word. As long as they are openly giving thinking people around the world more choices in what they are able to think about and talk about.

Universities, media outlets, foundations, corporate bureaucracies, and deep states have been thoroughly infiltrated by the stifling ideologies of political correctness and a painful hobbling of speech and inquiry. It will take much more than is being done to bring about a renaissance of ideas, visions, and launchpads for new cultural freedoms and human potentials.

But in just two years, a lot has already changed. After you finish cleaning your room, consider what you might do to assist in the cultural blossoming and transformation.

More:

NYT on the Intellectual Dark Web

It’s about the audience, stupid.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Jordan Peterson, Knowledge, Philosophy and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson, and Brett Weinstein… Where They Belong

  1. Abelard Lindsey says:

    The alt-right, as its called, is degenerating into splitting hairs over stuff like Christian theology and the like. Some of this is going off the deep end, like the brouhaha on Vox’s site about whether god is an “entity” or a force. This is just plain nuttiness. Perhaps we should debate how many angels can dance on a pin!

    It is true that Jordan Peterson’s concept of Christianity may be different than some others. It is also true that he is dancing around the issues of HBD. However, he is doing a lot of good in promoting a spirit of self-reliance in men. This is a good first step. I understand the issues surrounding HBD. Unlike Christianity, for example, HBD is observable (empirical) reality.

    Speaking of religion in general, and Christianity in particular, I recently reread an interesting book by Julien Jaynes on the origin of consciousness being rooted in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Jeynes theory is, by far, the most plausible explanation for the origin of religions (the Abrahamic religions in particular) that I have ever encountered. It seems credible to me that religious belief in modern humans is a vestigial remnant of bicameralism.

    • alfin2101 says:

      The more I learn about Peterson, Harris, Weinstein, and the rest of the IDW, the more things I find to both agree and disagree with. That seems to come from increased familiarity. As you say, Peterson is doing a lot of good, as are Harris, Weinstein, and the others.

      Most of what passes for thought in today’s mainstream is mere groupthink and echo chorus. Rational thought that breaks with such an indoctrination mindset is refreshing, even with flaws.

      I suspect that humans are still capable of bicameral thought, either with suppression of literacy or by emphasis of imagery beyond what we are accustomed to. Few would like their corpus callosi cut. 😉

Comments are closed.