Yes, You Bloody Idiots, People Can Tell the Difference Between Protests and Riots

Is there anything they will not riot over?

Poll data, including data generated by my own organization, show that Americans draw a clear distinction between demonstrating and rioting. Large majorities have no problem with demonstrations, but strongly disapprove of riots, looting and arson.

The problem is how to define what is going on around us. Democrats insist that protests are “mostly peaceful,” even as looting is rife and buildings are going up in flames. “Demonstrators” shut down highways, inconveniencing thousands and potentially endangering others’ lives. As time goes by, more voters are being convinced that what we are witnessing belongs largely in the riot category, rather than the demonstration category. __ Losing Patience With Biden’s Riots

They were taught all this in university “studies” classes, which are turning out to be an education in rioting. Violent riots over dead and injured thugs was not good enough, though. They are also planning to riot over the election results — win or lose. And now they want to riot over Supreme Court Justices!

Originally Taken off Facebook by Source

What’s next, rioting over a parent’s right to send kids to private schools, or to homeschool? Nothing is too extreme for them, it seems.

Perhaps the majority of Biden supporters are hoping that the Chinese army will move in to enforce the kind of law and order that they are enforcing in Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet, and against the Falun Gong. Of all the people pulling the strings of the Biden campaign and its riot campaign, the Chinese communists are at least in the running for having the most influence along with George Soros-linked groups.

Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. It is never too late to have a Dangerous Childhood © .

This entry was posted in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Yes, You Bloody Idiots, People Can Tell the Difference Between Protests and Riots

  1. Sher Singh says:

    Why do you push Neo con narratives?

    • alfin2101 says:

      Neocons are foreign interventionists. This blog does not promote that view. Your question is a non sequitur.

    • Sher Singh says:

      You call out Chinese communist interference in America, but have never considered that non whites have a survival interest in seeing your downfall.

      Feral, childless white academics push their apocalyptic politics around the globe; from feminism, to gay rights and the idea of courts deciding disputes between men.

      Such things as female dignity or marital consent, both designed to massively increase church power, have been pushed as the new normal.

      Blacks blame whites for their bad behaviour, whites blame Jews.

      You don’t connect colonial reform of society, such as a ban on Sati, to the continuing push for a new type of Leftism today with globohomo.

      Since it’s obvious whites are inherently leftist the best option is mass suicide.

      The individualism, nuclear family & tribal mixing the church pushed on you has made you defective subhumans with less of a grip on social reality than Nigerians.

      • alfin2101 says:

        First of all, what “church” are you talking about.

        Secondly, it is irrational to place all members of an extended breeding family such as “whites” into one pigeonhole.

        You are painting with a very broad brush, but at least you are starting to make some revelatory assertions.

Comments are closed.