One Out of Three People Around the World Lost Their Livelihood to the “Panic Pandemic,” Deadlier than the Real Virus

To keep audiences frightened around the clock, journalists seek out Cassandras with their own incentives for fearmongering: politicians, bureaucrats, activists, academics, and assorted experts who gain publicity, prestige, funding, and power during a crisis.

Source

One in three people worldwide lost a job or a business during the lockdowns, and half saw their earnings drop, according to a Gallup poll. Children, never at risk from the virus, in many places essentially lost a year of school. The economic and health consequences were felt most acutely among the less affluent in America and in the rest of the world, where the World Bank estimates that more than 100 million have been pushed into extreme poverty.

The leaders responsible for these disasters continue to pretend that their policies worked and assume that they can keep fooling the public. They’ve promised to deploy these strategies again in the future, and they might even succeed in doing so—unless we begin to understand what went wrong.

The Panic Pandemic

Evidence suggests that lockdowns did not save people from the virus. But they certainly destroyed businesses, depleted life savings, destroyed academic and career plans, and showed children just how idiotic and nonsensical the adult world can behave when driven into a panic by bloodthirsty journalists and crooked politicians.

“It was utterly immoral to conduct this society-wide intervention without the evidence to justify it,” Bhattacharya says. “The immediate results have been disastrous, especially for the poor, and the long-term effect will be to fundamentally undermine trust in public health and science.” The traditional strategy for dealing with pandemics was to isolate the infected and protect the most vulnerable, just as Atlas and the Great Barrington scientists recommended. The CDC’s pre-pandemic planning scenarios didn’t recommend extended school closures or any shutdown of businesses even during a plague as deadly as the 1918 Spanish flu. Yet Fauci dismissed the focused-protection strategy as “total nonsense” to “anybody who has any experience in epidemiology and infectious diseases,” and his verdict became “the science” to leaders in America and elsewhere.

Fortunately, a few leaders followed the science in a different way. Instead of blindly trusting Fauci, they listened to his critics and adopted the focused-protection strategy—most notably, in Florida. Its governor, Ron DeSantis, began to doubt the public-health establishment early in the pandemic, when computer models projected that Covid patients would greatly outnumber hospital beds in many states. Governors in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan were so alarmed and so determined to free up hospital beds that they directed nursing homes and other facilities to admit or readmit Covid patients—with deadly results.

Panic Pandemic

With a mortality rate in all infected persons of less than 0.5%, COVID did not rate the “bubonic plague” style lockdowns, with their ruinous economic aftertaste.

The criminal political/academic/media/corporate class has learned nothing from the lockdowns

The Covid 19 recession

Nations with worst lockdown policies are just now paying the price

Waiting for COVID

The national and global public health, political, media, and science establishments have failed abysmally, leaving behind a landscape of devastation.

This entry was posted in Economics, Pandemic. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to One Out of Three People Around the World Lost Their Livelihood to the “Panic Pandemic,” Deadlier than the Real Virus

  1. Rudolf Huber says:

    I lost too but we took the extra time this gave us and made sure our children passed the year on top of their class.

Comments are closed.